Brain Dump of Pertinence
by Parveen Kaler
In Silicon Valley, there are a lot of stories of meetings happening in hot tubs and deals being done at Bucks. I usually get together with a bunch of friends for a hot tub over at Scott‘s place each week. And we’re usually on the patio at Mel’s Saturday and Sunday morning.
A couple of us are game developers, others web developers, and others are accountants and lawyers. We usually catch up on rumours about who is jumping ship to startup their own studio, venture capital, Web 2.0, what’s new, what’s hot, what you’ve been playing, watching, reading, surfing, etc.
We’re all friends, so our conversation isn’t restricted to work. We usually gossip about who is dating whom, who had way too much to drink the night before, fashion, and all of the other yuppy topics that happen to be on our minds.
Having a diverse group of friends is really cool. I don’t really know how web development works and vice versa. When you have to explain revenue models to accountants and lawyers who also happen to be women, your descriptions really have to be stripped of buzzwords. And they have to make sense in a non-techy way.
I thought I would do a big brain dump of all of our recent topics.
Web 2.0 And How It Makes You Feel
Web 2.0 is a big, nebulous, made-up, marketing buzzword of a term. So imagine describing to a female accountant what it’s all about. I think Scott does an awesome job of this. User-generated content is an important part of Web 2.0. The big distinction is that the user feels a sense of ownership with the content that they have generated.
The important word in that last sentence is feeling.
Guys are logical, left-brain thinking, heaps of oaf. Women on the other hand are not going to fully grasp a concept until they understand how a concept is supposed to make you feel.
Yeah, I know. I am generalizing.
Permission Marketing
I wrote a comment about this over at Jamie’s blog.
The quality of the game is probably the biggest problem. But a second problem is what Seth Godin calls permission marketing. I dont give marketers permission to show me billboards in real life. Billboards are ugly and gaudy and generally detract from my usual environment. Commercials interrupt me when I really just want to be watching the current TV show.
I subscribe to Apples RSS feed for trailers. And I watch Nothing But Trailers on HDNet. But I dont really want to watch trailers when Im in a movie theater. I want to watch the film that I paid to see.
Seth Godin is brilliant at explaining Permission Marketing. His book is on my to read list. I’ll get around to it eventually.
Celebrity 2.0
Out in Hollywood, there are A-List and B-List celebrities. The blogosphere does have a similar concept. There are Technorati rankings. As of right now, I have a rank of 4,446,976.
But all in all, almost everyone is on the W-List.
In this context, the popularity of Paris Hilton’s vagina is quite odd. There is no feeling of ownership there. Paris is not my friend. Why am I supposed to care?
Whereas I keep up with all of my friends’ blogs. They are the celebrities I adore. This is The Long Tail of celebrity.
If I jump off a dumpster onto an Ikea table, only about 3 people actually care. But that’s still cool. I’m a very minor celebrity in their eyes.
mZfMFtQN8EU
Update: How ironical. I post about Web 2.0 and YouTube doesn’t allow me to embed my video. Here is the direct link.
Comments
you’re gonna break yo ass!
So this is what you did after Mels – gives a new meaning to ‘dumpster diving’.
So I’m 8,911,336. At yet, this is hard to imagine considering Technorati apparently trackes over 83 million blogs.
Anything outside any commercial value will/should be be towards the bottom of the list. If I count you, thats 2 people that may regularly view my blog. Factor an RSS feed and you wondering if you ranking will be lower as page impressions are not actually being made??
Oh, and your Macho Man Randy Savage leep from the canister is pitiful. I should drop the people’s elbow on you for even the attempt at what looked more like Yokozuna Drop.
My 2 thoughts anyways…
Just FYI–the ranking of 8,911,336 is some kind of estimate, as it is also what I got on Technorati…
Now, been meaning to comment on these two remarks in this blog entry:
“When you have to explain revenue models to accountants and lawyers who also happen to be women, your descriptions really have to be stripped of buzzwords. And they have to make sense in a non-techy way.”
I thought that you were more advanced than this Parv–I might actually have to use that quote in our Drupal meetup talk on women in tech. Yeah, women and buzzwords don’t compute. What do I do for a living again?
“Guys are logical, left-brain thinking, heaps of oaf. Women on the other hand are not going to fully grasp a concept until they understand how a concept is supposed to make you feel.”
Oh yeah. That’s why I can’t understand buzzwords…because I can only understand concepts based on feeling, not logic or function. *rolls eyes*
I’m not even going to bother any further ranting.
Did I mention the part where I was generalizing?
“Yeah, I know. I am generalizing.”
To be fair, this is probably the best way to communicate technical stuff to non-alpha-nerds. I strip out buzzwords for my parents.
Heck, I strip out buzzwords even when I’m talking to alpha-nerds. Alpha-nerds sometimes lose sight of the fact that technology is supposed to make you feel good.
on the subject of web 2.0, what it does, and how the eff it makes money, here’s an interesting link:
http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/120/facebook-is-the-it-company-of-2007.html
as to “feeling” over needing to understand…ummm…on behalf of accountants everywhere, I don’t really feel numbers. I look at numbers – and flowcharts – and invoices, then I run certain analytics, drill down for some additional data, then look at other items. Nowhere in this do I need to ‘feel’ quantitative items to understand them. And oh yeah, we have a lot of jargon too.